Posts by Gina

    It's fucking baffling!


    External Content twitter.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    So revisiting this. I had a thought. I sat down and waited. Since it remained Ill propose it.


    What if your band covered some early Humble Pie?

    Did you ponder this while taking a Cuban-coffee enhanced dump perhaps?

    Those stupid fuckers are going on their own free will though. Even though they're deceived of the conditions, they should have some common sense.

    He's exactly right. Why should there be any limit to the aid for Ukraine? Anything that happens in RUSSIA"S doing. Russia can't expect to be able to invade their neighbors and just tell everyone to stay out, or else.


    To give in to Russian nuclear blackmail and threats would be a huge mistake.


    If Europe did send troops into Ukraine, what the fuck is Russia going to do about it? They can't do jack shit. They won't start nuking everyone over Ukraine.


    The time to confront Russia is EXACTLY right now and over Ukraine.


    French President Emmanuel Macron reiterated Thursday, March 14, his position that sending Western troops into Ukraine should not be ruled out – though he said today's situation doesn't require that. But calling the conflict in Ukraine "existential for our Europe and for France," Macron said anybody advocating "limits" on aid to Ukraine "chooses defeat."


    In an interview on French national television, Macron said a Russian victory in Ukraine "would reduce Europe's credibility to zero," and would mean that "we have no security."


    Speaking on TF1 and France 2, Macron was asked about the prospect of sending Western troops to Ukraine, which he publicly raised last month in comments that prompted pushback from other European leaders. "We're not in that situation today," he said, but added that "all these options are possible."


    Macron said that responsibility for prompting such a move would lie with Moscow – "It wouldn't be us – and said France would not lead an offensive into Ukraine. But he also said, "Today, to have peace in Ukraine, we must not be weak."


    He said that the continent's security was "at stake" in the conflict which he said "is existential for our Europe and for France." He added that "if the situation should deteriorate, we would be ready to make sure that Russia never wins that war."


    He said there had been "too many limits in our vocabulary" since the Russian invasion in February 2022. "Two years ago we said we would never send tanks. We did. Two years ago, we said we would never send medium-range missiles. We did," he said. "Those who say 'let's not support Ukraine' do not make the choice of peace, they make the choice of defeat," he added.

    Of course. But that's not how it will be spun.

    Our election system is the most secure in history and cannot be questioned. Unless the Dem loses. In that case, it's rigged.

    Trying my hand at performing one of our upcoming songs


    Called "erase the lines"


    I messed up! I'm not used to playing standing up with a guitar strapped on. I haven't done that in years and years and years. So that's a new thing for me.


    External Content youtu.be
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.


    The Jetglows
    Listen to content by The Jetglows.
    lnk.to

    I can't imagine a scenario where the US would lose 3000 tanks, let alone to a country like Ukraine. For one, we would not allow our forces to be slaughterd like you guys do.


    Your inept military STILL has not gained ANY control of the skies in Ukraine The USA would have done that in three days tops. We could have won that war in 30 days - and coming from half a world away.

    I think P90s bite more than single coils and have more mid range and sound dirtier. So they're pretty good for a rock tone bur they also get kind of a single coil sound too.

    King has many isn't our slogan, with M1 destroyed one shot from T-72 or a couple of pogankas (RPGs) you have no chance.


    I have told you, I studied a weapon engineer conventional warheads. D-81, a 125mm smoothbore cannon is something of an engineering marvel. You don't have a concept of engineering art. A gun sending an AP sabot at 1850 meters per second having recoil of 30 cm - when a 40 ton tank on asphalt moves a meter back with each shot.

    You've done it by taking tanks as old as World war II era out of storage and trying to refurbish them. But you're running out of those now. You can't produce tanks as fast as you're losing them.


    You've got maybe two or three years at this rate before you're fucked

    You lost more tanks than you originally started with in Ukraine.