Posts by Island Man

    Arlo is right!


    I will post a couple other sources but there are tons of sources.


    This is my biggest issue with being a conservative. Many other conservatives are blue pilled just like the black lives matter folks. It is difficult because it didn't used to be this way. How did it come to this? Hardly anybody cares about the truth these days, which is scary as fuck!



    AP fact check: Trump takes credit for Obama’s gains for vets



    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/f…ment-of-veterans-affairs/


    https://www.pbs.org/newshour/p…for-obamas-gains-for-vets

    Is this really what they do on spring break these days?


    External Content twitter.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    I bought both of their albums on vinyl. I'm really intrigued by the use of old instruments and mics. T bone Burnett produced both and it seems like he's trying and doing a great job at using authentic equipment to replicate a throwback sound. I don't think anyone does this as well as him...


    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.

    I bought their music too. Great stuff!

    The "red pill" and "blue pill" are symbolic of states of awareness.


    In a nut shelll: A blue pilled person lives in an illusion. This illusion shields people from seeing the world for what it really is. Those in power could consciously provide blue pills to dumb down the herd. But on a grass-root level, people also, unconsciously, provide blue pills side-ways and even bottom-up, when the masses take illusion as reality.


    When the majority of people are attached to a certain belief system, it’s incredibly difficult to change their minds. The Matrix movie shows us that most people that are plugged into the Matrix aren’t ready for the truth. Moreover, when their reality is challenged, they will resist. In a blue pill world, people even get punished simply for telling a painful or politically incorrect truth.

    Mostly after a great tragedy, one begins to awaken and starts to question all previously accepted realities about this world, and realizes that he or she has been living in a lie.

    This realization often brings about an emotional reaction of anger and depression, which is called the red pill rage. Some stay in that rage forever, while others come to terms with reality.

    Red pill knowledge contains tons of information about different subjects. People spread this knowledge, and their own experiences and observations, to teach others what they have learned.

    Other people’s knowledge can be used as a compass – a torch that illuminates the path to our own experienced truth. We see the world through new eyes; eyes that we have never used before. And it’s only when we become aware, and now see and experience ourselves these things that others told us, that the red pill truly kicks in.

    What do you think of the Pole Shift's book, and Henry Makow's books? I may put those 4 on my list for April.

    The pole shift book is pretty good, but if you want the very best it is this one "The Adam and Eve Story".


    If you want to read about pole shift read this one first that I will attach as a PDF. I don't think you will find one to buy anywhere. The Author when he went to publish it was hired by the Federal Government and the book was classified for a long period of time.


    As far as the illuminatti books by Makow go, they were good but the best one and the one you should start with is by Bill Marrs - The Illuminati: The Secret Societies that Highjacked the World. Bill is an investigative reporter and he provides sources for all the key data in the book. That way you can look further at any source for anything you may have further questions about etc. Makow's books basically expand on Bill Marr's work and repeat some of it too. So I would suggest you start with Bill Marrs.


    I have the Adam & Eve Story in PDF but not sure it is possible to upload it here.

    The blue pill does have its benefits. Sometimes I am a bit envious of the ability to enjoy contented ignorance. I bet there are only about 1% of the population that are not blue pill if I had to guess. But I think there may be at least two other's that have taken the red pill here so I am not alone at least. Many take the blue pill but think they took the red pill so it can be confusing for some. Did you know you even took a pill?

    I am the same. I rarely read fiction. I prefer non fiction of course. If I do read fiction, I prefer science fiction because it usually has a lot of truth in it. Usually the kind of truth that we are not supposed to know or read about so it is hidden in science fiction sometimes.

    Speed reading is an amazing ability to have, but it really takes some time to develop even after the speed reading course. Reading comprehension also the same. You have to really make to to read a lot to develop these things and it is best to start when you are younger I think.

    Here is the exact language of the Bill as it stands.


    SENATE BILL 669

    By: Senator Smith


    Introduced and read first time: February 4, 2022 Assigned to: Judicial Proceedings


    AN ACT concerning

    A BILL ENTITLED

    Pregnant Person’s Freedom Act of 2022

    FOR the purpose of altering certain provisions of law relating to the termination of a pregnancy and investigations of or criminal penalties or civil liabilities for a pregnant person or a person assisting a pregnant person; prohibiting a certain provision of law that requires the termination of a pregnancy by a licensed physician from being construed to apply to a certain pregnant person; and generally relating to the termination of pregnancy.

    BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, Article Criminal Law

    Section 2103

    Annotated Code of Maryland

    (2021 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement)

    BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, Article Health General

    Section 20207

    Annotated Code of Maryland

    (2019 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement)

    BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, Article Health General

    Section 20208 and 20209

    Annotated Code of Maryland

    (2019 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement)

    SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, That the Laws of Maryland read as follows:

    Article Criminal Law

    EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MATTER ADDED TO EXISTING LAW. [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law.


    2 SENATE BILL 669 2103.

    (a) For purposes of a prosecution under this title, “viable” has the meaning stated in § 20209 of the Health General Article.

    (b) Except as provided in subsections (d) through (f) of this section, a prosecution may be instituted for murder or manslaughter of a viable fetus.

    (c) A person prosecuted for murder or manslaughter as provided in subsection (b) of this section must have:

    (1) intended to cause the death of the viable fetus;

    (2) intended to cause serious physical injury to the viable fetus; or

    (3) wantonly or recklessly disregarded the likelihood that the person’s actions would cause the death of or serious physical injury to the viable fetus.

    (d) Nothing in this section applies to or infringes on a [woman’s] PREGNANT PERSONS right to terminate a pregnancy as stated in § 20209 of the Health General Article.

    (e) Nothing in this section subjects a physician or other licensed medical professional to liability for fetal death that occurs in the course of administering lawful medical care.

    18 (f) Nothing in this section applies to an act or failure to act of a pregnant [woman]


    PERSON with regard to [her] THE PERSONS own fetus.

    (g) Nothing in this section shall be construed to confer personhood or any rights

    on the fetus.

    (H) THIS SECTION MAY NOT BE CONSTRUED TO AUTHORIZE ANY FORM OF INVESTIGATION OR PENALTY FOR A PERSON:

    (1) TERMINATING OR ATTEMPTING TO TERMINATE THE PERSONS OWN PREGNANCY; OR

    (2) EXPERIENCING A MISCARRIAGE, PERINATAL DEATH RELATED TO A FAILURE TO ACT, OR STILLBIRTH.

    (I) A PERSON IS NOT SUBJECT TO CRIMINAL PENALTIES OR CIVIL DAMAGES FOR AIDING, INFORMING, OR IN ANY WAY ASSISTING A PREGNANT PERSON IN TERMINATING OR SEEKING TO TERMINATE THE PERSONS PREGNANCY.


    (J) A PERSON MAY BRING A CAUSE OF ACTION FOR DAMAGES IF THE PERSON WAS SUBJECT TO UNLAWFUL ARREST OR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION FOR A VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION AS A RESULT OF:

    (1) TERMINATING OR ATTEMPTING TO TERMINATE THE PERSONS OWN PREGNANCY;

    (2) EXPERIENCING A MISCARRIAGE, STILLBIRTH, OR PERINATAL DEATH; OR

    (3) AIDING, INFORMING, OR IN ANY WAY ASSISTING A PREGNANT PERSON IN TERMINATING OR ATTEMPTING TO TERMINATE THE PERSONS PREGNANCY.

    Article Health General

    20207.

    In Part II of this subtitle, the word “physician” means any person, including a doctor of osteopathy, licensed to practice medicine in the State of Maryland in compliance with the provisions of Title 14 of the Health Occupations Article.

    20208.

    (A) An abortion must be performed by a licensed physician.

    (B) THIS SECTION MAY NOT BE CONSTRUED TO APPLY TO A PREGNANT PERSON WHO TERMINATES THE PERSONS OWN PREGNANCY UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.

    SENATE BILL 669 3

    21 20209.

    22 (a) In this section, “viable” means that stage when, in the best medical judgment

    of the attending physician based on the particular facts of the case before the physician, there is a reasonable likelihood of the fetus’s sustained survival outside the womb.

    (b) (1) THE STATE MAY NOT INVESTIGATE OR PENALIZE A PREGNANT PERSON FOR TERMINATING THE PERSONS OWN PREGNANCY UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.

    (2) Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, the State may not interfere with the decision of a [woman] PREGNANT PERSON to terminate [a] THE PERSONS OWN pregnancy:


    SENATE BILL 669


    At any time during the [woman’s] PERSONS OWN pregnancy, if:

    1. The termination procedure is necessary to protect the life or health of the [woman] PERSON; or

    [(ii)] 2. The fetus is affected by genetic defect or serious deformity (c) The Department may adopt regulations that:

    (1) Are both necessary and the least intrusive method to protect the life or health of the [woman] PERSON; and

    (2) Are not inconsistent with established medical practice.

    (d) (1) The physician is not liable for civil damages or subject to a criminal penalty for a decision to [perform an abortion] PROVIDE ABORTIVE CARE under this section made in good faith and in the physician’s best medical judgment in accordance with accepted standards of medical practice.

    (2) A PREGNANT PERSON IS NOT LIABLE FOR CIVIL DAMAGES OR SUBJECT TO A CRIMINAL PENALTY FOR TERMINATING OR ATTEMPTING TO TERMINATE THE PERSONS OWN PREGNANCY UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.

    SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect October 1, 2022.

    When a vaccine kills a month old or younger should the doctor or the drug manufacturer be charged with murder? Should the mother be charged for allowing the vaccine to be given?


    Classic red herring. This is completely different from a mother deliberately neglecting her child to the point it dies and being immune from prosecution for it.


    Furthermore, there is only one vaccine given to infants that young, Hepatitis B. They get two shots from birth to two months. Everything else is from 2 months and up.


    https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/s…ild-adolescent-shell.html

    The exact language of the bill states: ‘This section may not be construed to authorize any form of investigation or penalty for a person ... experiencing a ... Perinatal death related to a failure to act.


    The Bill makes sense to me. A mother gets in a car accident rear ending the car in front of her. The baby dies as a result of the accident. The mother could have prevented the death by not putting the baby in the car to begin with. Her failure to act could be criminal. Laws are weird and there are too many laws. We need less laws. Waaaay less!

    Should Biden have continued to buy Russian oil?

    I don't think that is a question anybody here is qualified or has a clue in answering. It is a national security issue and in times of war it is best for those in charge of National Security to go with the best possible strategy for the success of the USA. Biden and previous Presidents are just the face on the national security puppet that announces these things when the decision is made.


    Should Kim Kardashian have a shrimp salad or a cobb salad for dinner? This might be a better question to ask.

    Here is what I have been reading the last month:


    The Complete Ketopgenic Diet for Beginners - Amy Ramos


    White Cargo - Jordan & Walsh


    Anam Cara - O'donohue


    Pole Shift Evidence Will Not Be Silenced - David Montaigne


    The Lost Treasure of the Templars - James Becker


    Illuminatti The Cult That Hijacked The World - Henry Makow


    Illuminatti 2 Deceit and Seduction - Henry Makow


    Illuminatti 3 Satanic Possession - Henry Makow


    Cruel Hoax Feminism & The New World Order - Henry Makow

    When a vaccine kills a month old or younger should the doctor or the drug manufacturer be charged with murder? Should the mother be charged for allowing the vaccine to be given?