By Igor Chudov
Igors Newsletter
August 15, 2022
"The World Economic Forum is becoming a little concerned. Unapproved opinions are becoming more popular, and online censors cannot keep up with millions of people becoming more aware and more vocal. The censorship engines employed by Internet platforms, turned out to be quite stupid and incapable. People are even daring to complain about the World Economic Forum, which is obviously completely unacceptable.
So, WEF author came up with a solution: she proposes to collect off-platform intelligence from “millions of sources” to spy on people and new ideas, and then merge this information together for “content removal decisions” sent down to “Internet platforms”.
What is this about? What’s new?
The way censorship is done these days is that each Internet platform, such as Twitter, has its own moderation team and a decision making engine. Twitter would only look at tweets by any specific twitter user, when deciding on whether to delete any tweets or suspend their authors. Twitter moderators do NOT look at Gettr or other external websites.
So, for example, user @JohnSmith12345 may have a Twitter account and narrowly abide by Twitter rules, but at the same time have a Gettr account where he would publish anti-vaccine messages. Twitter would not be able to suspend @JohnSmith12345’s account. That is no longer acceptable to the WEF because they want to silence people and ideas, not individual messages or accounts.
This explains why the WEF needs to move beyond the major Internet platforms, in order to collect intelligence about people and ideas everywhere else. Such an approach would allow them to know better what person or idea to censor — on all major platforms at once.
They want to collect intelligence from “millions of sources”, and train their “AI systems” to detect thoughts that they do not like, to make content removal decisions handed down to the likes of Twitter, Facebook, and so on. This is a major change from the status quo of each platform deciding what to do based on messages posted to that specific platform only.
For example, in addition to looking at my Twitter profile, WEF’s proposed AI would also look at my Gettr profile, and then it would make an “intelligent decision” to remove me from the Internet at once. It is somewhat of a simplification because they also want to look for ideas and not only individuals but, nevertheless, the search for wrongthink becomes globalized.
This IS NOT A CONSPIRACY?
-
I need to read that when I have time today.
-
Indoctrination will be more successful when it doesn't have to be at gunpoint. Soylent Green, we're saving the planet.
-
so you mean the right or conservative sites are just going to allow it? so many things wrong with that post. how exactly will you get removed from the internet. ABC sure as hell you won't get removed for posting masks are stupid.
me thinks that post has something to do with the fact people keep threatening some officials and they get arrested.
-
Web crawler bots are a thing.
-
so you mean the right or conservative sites are just going to allow it? so many things wrong with that post. how exactly will you get removed from the internet. ABC sure as hell you won't get removed for posting masks are stupid.
me thinks that post has something to do with the fact people keep threatening some officials and they get arrested.
People venting and saying things like all Democrats should be hanged is not actually threatening an official. Calling someone and telling them you are going to kill them, that's a threat. No search algorithms needed for that.
-
If saying things like "I wish Trump were dead" was a threat then every Democrat in the country would be guilty.
-
If saying things like "I wish Trump were dead" was a threat then every Democrat in the country would be guilty.
not true, I have never wished trump was dead that I recall.
-
hard of reading
