I cut/pasted this from another board. It’s by a guy that has been accurate on all subjects that he addresses. YMMV
“As I have stated before, I work in a field that has me intimately tied to vaccines and the issues/non-issues with them.
A few comments/observations.
1) - Whatever these mRNA agents are - they are NOT vaccines in any classic sense.
2) - Prior to WuFLu this technology has only been used to treat severe, fatal genetic disorders (e.g., Tay-Sachs disease). Save a few experiments with corona viruses in ferret - that resulted in 100% fatality with the "vaccine."
3) - There is NO vaccine or vaccine scenario that is better than natural immunity one develops having contracted a disease and fighting it off with your own immune system. Once this is achieved NO vaccine can significantly add to that immunity.
4) - By any scientific/medical standard these "vaccines" have NOT passed any kind of safety standard - and all remain under Emergency Use Authorizations. I point out that many of the claims of what these will not do have already been proven wrong (i.e., the mRNA has back coded into host DNA, graphene found throughout the body).
5) - Given the Federal laws on EMU and the Nuremberg Code any attempt to force/coerce/demand that someone be inoculated with an experimental drug is patently and morally wrong. Federal law bans this process.
6) - Sadly, one needs to look to foreign news sources for clarity in harm and death data as relates to these "vaccines." What is provided here does not follow any sort of scientific protocol that I know of. This was also true for 'alternative' therapies to include - ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, Vits C & D, and Zn.
7) - I point out that the Federal government has granted themselves and the pharmaceutical companies blanket immunity against lawsuits - that is NOT true for the private companies that have had mandates... Just wait for the lawsuits.
- We are seeing giant upticks in specificities health issues - to include cardiac problems and untimely deaths - these have yet to be properly examined, yet it appears there is a 'push' to sweep much of this under the carpet - why is that??
Shouldn't we be after the full truth??
Your thoughts may vary.”